Endnotes Volume 1, Issue 1.45

I posit the thread here. It will be developed in the course of these several papers.

2. This has severe consequences in that it may be a limit on what we can know. See Volume 1, Issue � �1.3, this publication.

A perfect circle when the circumference is taken as time.

Here it is useful to consider the frequency of the planet orbit in terms proportional to its period in seconds. Its period is roughly 31,436,000 or 3.1436 x 10 seconds, for a frequency of 1/3.1436 x 10 Hz. How far does it travel in that time? It travels the distance necessary to fulfill Kepler's law of areas.

That knowledge gained from perception and applied to the areas we do not perceive. For example the idea that objects are fundamental to a universal order, or that atomic aggregate matter is the universal form of substance, or that the electron manifests internal to the atom in the same manner it manifests external to the atom.

6. The exception of and focus on mass is not entertained in this issue. I include a reference in context here for completeness. See Volume 1, Issue 1,3, this publication.

While it is reasonable to assume that mathematical orders of form are representative of the principles of action in the stable universe, it is not reasonable to assume that the perceived properties which operate within those orders of form have a real physical counterpart.

The destruction of a building into chunks of rubble, does not make the building's original composition one of chunks, one of rubble, or one of chunks of rubble, however uniform those chunks may be.

Over two hundred transitory high energy particles had been created using particle accelerator technology.

Unstable.

Euclidean geometry does not deal with time in any sense of the word. It deals with rigid objects in a space that allows the objects to exist. Parallel lines are lines that by definition, never meet. That is intrinsic in the word parallel. Any lines that eventually meet, are not parallel lines in the first place.

See Volume 1, Issue 1.7, this publication.

Consider the game of Chess and the game of Go or Paduk Consider the game of mathematics. How do any professionals in any of these disciplines acquire control over our view of the universe? By what quality?

I had to qualify this. There's no telling what the general American public will elect to office. Ronald Reagan for instance.

I qualify this aspect of my approach as instant because this is only one of several main pillars of physical thought that I attack. In other issues I object to the universal attraction clause of gravity, I argue for a real time visible universe, and I remove time, outside of the mathematics, as a physical dimension for the universe. To mention only three.

The ancient belief that the planets moved in perfect circles caused a patchwork construction of circles drawn on circles to square the motion with observation. In computer programming terms we call this a kluge.

about>>>

<<